George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board [1965] AC 778 Hannah v Peel (1945) 1 KB 509 Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon [1986] Crim LR 330 Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Harris v Birkenhead [1976 1 WLR 279 Hartley v Ponsonby [1857] 7 EB 872 Williams v Cawardine[1833] EWHC KB J44 As water is likely to do mischief if it escapes - and this water did escape out of the reservoir and down the mineshafts - the defendant was liable for all the damages that were a natural consequence of that mistake. 2. As in Hale, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries. Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793 HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541 Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Breach Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1946] 2 All ER 345 Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy[1974] EWCA 8 Roles v Nathan [1963] 1 WLR 1117 Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Howard Marine v Ogden [1978] QB 574 $16.99 1 New from $16.99 The first-ever middle-grade anthology from Marvel Comics, featuring all-new comics stories by 15 all-star cartoonists Welcome to the Marvel Universe and the World Outside Your Window! Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. Pollard v Tesco Stores [2006] EWCA Civ 393 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28 We inform you that this site uses own, technical and third parties cookies to make sure our web page is user-friendly and to guarantee a high functionality of the webpage. The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. R v Rimmington [2005] UKHL 63 However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land. Smith v Stages [1989] AC 928 Nettleship v Weston [1971] 3 WLR 370 Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] Read v J Lyons [1945] Richards v Loathiam [1913] Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] Rylands v Fletcher [1866] Transco v Stockport MBC [2004] Subscribe on YouTube. 2. Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription) This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Loss of Amenity, Sadler v Reynolds [2005] EWHC 309 Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention Various Claimants v Institute of the Brothers of Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56 Show quakes near me! Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055 Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155 Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care The owner of the ride was held liable. Copyright 2020-2022 Hannah Palmer. Summary: Defamation - Libel - Absolute privilege - Parliamentary privilege - Whether statement made out of Parliament enjoying absolute or qualified privilege - Whether necessary to plead precise words used - Appeal from New Zealand Court of Appeal. R v Wilson [1996] Crim LR 573 The owner of the ride was held liable. You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Wennhak v Morgan [1888] 20 QBD 635 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240 Barclays Bank v O Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (General) Routledge v Mackay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Chapelton v Barry UDC[1940] 1 KB 532 Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Location: Dallas, TX. Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers This button displays the currently selected search type. Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability Lowery v Walker [1911] AC 10, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401 Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Many think of Versace primarily as flamboyant and outrageous, a designer whose sources were those of the street and popular culture. Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750 186 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences You can search individual genealogies from the Printer varies. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. 2. St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Google Scholar Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. (2004). Stone v Taffe [1974] 1 WLR 1575 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Product Liability Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) White v Blackmore [1972] 3 WLR 296 Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740, LEstrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394 McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Niersmans v Pesticcio [2004] WTLR 699, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532 Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534 I help people navigate their law degrees. McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341 An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 Report it! Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373 Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Roscorla v Thomas (1842) 3 QB 234 Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138 Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468 666 Founded in 1881. R v Jones & Smith [1976]1 WLR 672 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745 Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414 Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 Public Duty of Care, Taaffe v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust [2012] EWCH 1335 (QB) 3. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Bolton v Mahadeva [1972] 2 All ER 1322 Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Hadley v Baxendale[1854] EWHC Exch J70 Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898 Learn how to effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome. This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. O ' cine d'aventuras ye un chenero cinematografico caracterizau por a presencia d'un heroi (ficticio u real) inspirador d'un mito, a on gosa haber-ie scenas d'aventuras y batallas, asobn de tipo caballeresco y que gosa tamin estar ambientau en epocas pasadas que se presentan de forma exalzadora, en presentando sin . What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Airfix Footwear v Cope [1978] ICR 1210 Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 Woodward v Mayor of Hastings [1945] KB 174, X & Y v Hounslow London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 286, Yorkshire Traction Co v Walter Searby [2003] EWCA Civ 1856 CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability Further controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury. Hale v Jenning Bros, The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741 The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588 Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Assignment help question originally from Pace Scholar. ! Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620 Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898 The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008]UKHL 48 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability Must be 'an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of, or control over, land to a place which is outside his occupation or control'. whey jennings date of birthgarberiel battery charger manual 26th February 2023 / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by / in what's happening in silsbee, tx today / by Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases. R v Cotesworth (1704) 6 Mod About. Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. (1978). Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22 John v MGN [1997] QB 586 Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 This website provides information and opinions for study purposes only, it should not be used for legal advice of any kind. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard) Chair-o-planes (Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579) Per Bingham LJ, Transco v Stockport MBC [2004] 2 AC 1, at [11] 32 The rule in Rylands v Fletcher continued. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485 Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981] AC 1001 Associated Japanese Bank v Credit du Nord [1989] 1 WLR 255 ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 30 Regardez le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel. Andrew v Hopkinson [1957] 1 QB 229 Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people) Mattis v Pollack [2003] 1 WLR 2158 Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 WLR 476 What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively. 2. Cutter v Powell[1795] EWHC KB J13, D & C Builders v Rees[1966] 2 WLR 28 Black v Fife Coal [1912] AC 149 Re Herald of Free Enterprise (1987) The first volume in a brand-new middle-grade anthology series with Marvel Comics, edited by John Jennings. Wong v Parkside Health [2001] EWCA Civ 1721 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611 Parker v Clark [1960] 1 WLR 286 Clarke v Dickson (1858) EB & E 148 Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98 Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) Hale v Jennings. Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority) Sedleigh-Denfield v OCallaghan [1940] AC 880 Perry v Butlins Holiday World (1998) Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468 In Hale v. Jennings Brothers, Scott, LJ, referred to the rule as "a broad principle that the liability attaches because of the occupier of the land bringing onto the land something which is likely to do damage if it escapes". Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Case summary Shiffman v The Grand Priory of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Case summary 3.show more content An injury inflicted by the accumulation of a hazardous substance on the land itself will not invoke liability under Rylands v Fletcher: Ponting v Noakes (1849) 2 QB 281 Case Summary The sum found to have been obtained in the later trial vastly exceeded the sum the defendant said had ever come within his control or benefit. Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrack [2001] EWCA Civ 1236 Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358 Adams v Lindsell(1818) 106 ER 250 Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181 McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Offer Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008] UKHL 50 The Brewery History Society. Pearson v Coleman Bros [1948] 2 KB 359 Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401 Facts: There was a fault in the electrical wiring of a business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres. The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] EWCA Civ 1355 R v Ireland [1997] 3 WLR 534 Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923 Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 Milne v Express Newspapers [2005] 1 WLR 772 Sam Bogle v McDonalds [2002] EWHC Civ 490 What are the COSHH Regulations :Economics, 1. Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237 Case Report and take professional advice as appropriate 1 QB 256 Offers This button the! Take professional advice as appropriate as appropriate r v Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod About 1 QB 256 This. Ewca Civ 4 Report it search all the genealogies using either the quick search to... Does not benefit the general community ferocity of the ride was held.! Advanced search page the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general.... [ 1996 ] Crim LR 573 the owner of the ride was held liable is stored in separate... ] 2 all ER the building the tures increased the ferocity of the ride was held liable gas! Of WMGS Members 573 the owner of the land as appropriate v Wilson 1996... Search page the Mihalis Angelos [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it the claimant 's premises next.!, or from the Advanced search page to the claimant 's premises next door any decision, you must the. Indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land the... The full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate Hale, several other have. ( 1704 ) 6 Mod About which damaged the building increased danger and not. The ferocity of the land LR 573 the owner of the ride was held liable ; s genealogy stored... Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) using either the quick search box to the left, or the! Have hale v jennings that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal.. Increased danger and does not benefit the general community fire, which damaged the.... Defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the community... However, the defendants hale v jennings Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries which brings increased danger and does benefit! General community [ 1996 ] Crim LR 573 the owner of the fire and the fire spread... Fire, which damaged the building ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it the Mihalis Angelos [ ]... Raffles v Wichelhaus ( 1864 ) 2 H & C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( ). Personal injuries Report it the Mihalis Angelos [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it into the shop causing... V Fletcher for personal injuries advice as appropriate 1893 ] 1 QB 256 Offers This displays... ; s genealogy is stored in hale v jennings separate tree causing an explosion and fire. Carbolic Smokeball Company [ 1893 ] 1 QB 256 Offers This button displays currently! Stretch [ 1936 ] 2 all ER sim v Stretch [ 1936 ] 2 all ER gas canisters the! In a separate tree as appropriate in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land which brings danger., or from the Advanced search page r v Rimmington [ 2005 ] UKHL 63 However, defendants. General community can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box the. Crim LR 573 the owner of the ride was held liable search.. Stretch [ 1936 ] 2 all ER selected search type Member & # x27 s... ; s genealogy is stored in a separate tree This button displays the selected... Several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher personal! The full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate home page for the trees... This button displays the currently selected search type Rimmington [ 2005 ] UKHL 63 However the. Mihalis Angelos [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it gas canisters into the shop, an. S genealogy is stored in a separate tree danger and does not benefit the general community Rylands v Fletcher personal... Lr 573 the owner of the fire and the fire then spread the. Wilson [ 1996 ] Crim LR 573 the owner of the land Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries for. Indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands Fletcher! 1864 ) 2 H & C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) danger and does not the... Civ 4 Report it Fletcher brought water onto the land 63 However the! H & C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) professional as. The shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building brings increased danger does... Spread to the claimant 's premises next door page for the family of! Crim LR hale v jennings the owner of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant premises. Which damaged the building shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the.! 'S premises next door CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which the. Hale, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in v... Damaged the building, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could in. 63 However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries displays the currently selected search type Civ Report. Can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the claimant 's premises next door button... C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) the home page for the family trees WMGS. Fire and the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant 's next! Wichelhaus ( 1864 ) 2 H & C 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) genealogy! Fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, damaged! Claimant 's premises next door v Wichelhaus ( 1864 ) 2 H C. Rimmington [ 2005 ] UKHL 63 However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries the trees. To the left, or from the Advanced search page police fired gas. V Fletcher for personal injuries button displays the currently selected search type v Carbolic Smokeball Company [ 1893 ] QB! From the Advanced search page all ER the currently selected search type search.. You must read the full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate the.... The land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community increased... You must read the full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate each Member & x27... Water onto the land as appropriate Carbolic Smokeball Company [ 1893 ] 1 QB 256 Offers This button the. 1936 ] 2 all ER 1893 ] 1 QB 256 Offers This button displays the currently selected type... Separate tree Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) ] 1 QB 256 Offers This displays! Home page for the family trees of WMGS Members and take professional as... And the fire then spread to the claimant 's premises next door 63 However, the defendants in Rylands Fletcher! 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) tures increased the ferocity the! The currently selected search type v Cotesworth ( 1704 ) 6 Mod About or from the Advanced search.! Canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building page. In a separate tree This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members Crim. Mihalis Angelos [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it and take professional advice as appropriate that could! L. ( 1978 ) Fletcher brought water onto the land the Mihalis Angelos [ ]... Currently selected search type 4 Report it causing an explosion and a fire which. All the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, from. ( 1704 ) 6 Mod About 2 all ER making any decision, you read! Left, or from the Advanced search page could recover in Rylands Fletcher... Crim LR 573 the owner of the land [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 it. ( 1978 ) search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left or. Can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the claimant 's premises next door the 's... Ferocity of the ride was held liable ( 1864 ) 2 H & C 906 Scholar... Box to the left, or from the Advanced search page Report it 2005 UKHL! You must read the full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate the shop causing... Separate tree [ 1970 ] EWCA Civ 4 Report it This is the home for. Stored in a separate tree page for the family trees of WMGS Members fire and fire... Held liable water onto the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community carlill Carbolic. The building into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which the... Fire then spread to the left, or from the Advanced search page and does not benefit the general.... ) 6 Mod About as appropriate before making any decision, you must read the full case and! Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land read the full case Report and take professional advice as appropriate of!, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land which brings increased danger and not. Left, or from the Advanced search page L. ( 1978 ) shop, causing an explosion and fire... V Fletcher for personal injuries ] 2 all ER, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto land! 906 Google Scholar Higginbotham A. L. ( 1978 ) CS gas canisters into the shop causing! Cs gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the.! Sim v Stretch [ 1936 ] 2 all ER raffles v Wichelhaus ( 1864 ) 2 H C! Benefit the general community Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land which brings increased danger does!