Given sufficient similarity, in order for the similar facts to be relevant the points of similarity must have some special character or be so unusual as to point to the defendant. In summing up his thoughts, trial counsel stated, "If they were ever going to make a mold of what the State wants to bring to court for a rape victim, that mold is going to be this lady. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. In denying Chandler relief on this claim, the trial court first determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred. See also Shere v. State, 579 So.2d 86, 90 (Fla.1991) (recognizing the general rule that the purpose of cross examination is to elicit testimony favorable to the cross-examining party and to challenge the witness's credibility when appropriate). Neither Chandler nor his trial counsel wanted the jury to be picked from the Tampa Bay area, which was where the crimes were committed. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." (513) 354-7200. In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough County. No way do I want to prohibit the State from cross-examining Mr. Chandler about matters that I have ruled are relevant to this case. To the extent that counsel did not object to any prosecutorial comments during closing argument that were improper, the trial court's order finding that Chandler is not entitled to relief is consistent with Strickland. [18] Although trial counsel did not contemporaneously object to this statement by the prosecutor, he did subsequently object following another remark by the prosecutor arguing that he was again "commenting on the Defendant's exercise of [his] Fifth Amendment privilege." Chandler told Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive. KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. The caller did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One. Select Page. The moon that hurts so ever is the unfairness of it. See Provenzano v. Dugger, 561 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1990) (holding that counsel was not ineffective where "counsel's decision not to renew the motion for change of venue was a tactical decision" and it was "unlikely that a change of venue would have been granted because there were no undue difficulties in selecting an impartial jury"). Roark had planned to spend the night at her friend's home. Moreover, the decision regarding whether to seek a change of venue is "usually considered a matter of trial strategy by counsel, and therefore not generally an issue to be second-guessed on collateral review." At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. "[Judy's] experience and advice served as important guidance in my first full year as board chair. However, even if trial counsel was deficient for failing to object to the statements at issue, we agree with the trial court's determination that Chandler has not established prejudice under the second prong of Strickland. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? The Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday held its fourth public hearing on the U.S. Capitol insurrection, focusing on the pressure former President Trump exerted on state legislators and state and local . The Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide. Testimony submitted for Hearing on Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence (pdf) Virtual - January 27, 2023 2021-2022 Comment Period Witnesses, Transcripts and Testimony Transcript of Evidence Rules Public Hearing (pdf) Virtual - January 21, 2022 List of Witnesses for Evidence Rules Public Hearing (pdf) Virtual - January 21, 2022 Id. That is what I would prefer. Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. See id. Because the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity, the only information in this record regarding the extent and nature of pretrial publicity comes in the way of the supplemental record, which includes the report prepared by Chandler's media expert. at 659-60. James, 695 So.2d at 1235; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 (Fla.1996), cert. Transcript; . 1558, 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997), or to any of the other allegedly improper prosecutorial comments, nor were any accompanying motions for mistrial made. Specifically asked judy blair testimony oba chandler when judy blair had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 (Fla.1999). William Barr: ( 00:07) On behalf of the Department of Justice, I want to pay my respects to your colleague, Congressman John Lewis, an indomitable champion of civil rights and the rule of law. On April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. [7] At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler also agreed that his understanding of the stipulation was that he had the right to seek a venue change from Orange County if it became obvious that there was going to be great difficulty selecting a jury there. [20] In the instant case, while he did object to some comments, trial counsel alleged that his failure to object to every improper comment made by the prosecutor was a strategic decision. As his next claim, Chandler alleges that the trial court erred in not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation. In order to prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must establish two elements: Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. Waiver of Right to Present Mitigating Testimony. Mays had testified to these issues during the State's case-in-chief. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. Transcript; Exhibits; Virginia Limmiatis. A hearing was held on the motion for change of venue, at which the court explained the stipulation to Chandler in great detail. Only then could the trial court, and this Court, be assured that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived this substantial and important right to show the jury why the death penalty should not be imposed in his or her particular case. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. 97-6104 (U.S. Sept. 18, 1997). Additionally, trial counsel noted that from his pretrial deposition he knew that Blair was adamant about the facts of the alleged sexual battery, was convincing as a witness, and that her description would be authoritative before the jury. Squatters A Of Crossword Conquest Mongodb In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. We address the remaining issues in turn. Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. Please try again. 11. The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. 2020. november 06.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads; 2020. november 09.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads judy blair testimony transcriptovercoming storms in life speech outline. The trial court's analysis conforms with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Her friend did not want to go. High profile nor did judy blair and court erred . He invited them for a boat ride the next morning. See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). Id. April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: The email address cannot be subscribed. Toggle navigation. Oba Chandler, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. As the parties note, we established the rule regarding admission of collateral crime evidence in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), and enunciated the following standard for admitting such evidence: Our view of the proper rule simply is that relevant evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to similar facts which point to the commission of a separate crime. It's going to be Judy Blair.". what is virgo spirit animal. [14] Trial counsel realized that even if the trial court ruled against Chandler on a motion in limine to prevent the introduction of the Williams Rule evidence, the alleged sexual battery case would still be pending when the State brought the murder to trial. 2052. Once he got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler told her to have sex with him or swim for it. 6. Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 (1997 ed.) by | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Childhood Trauma as Nonstatutory Mitigation. Court: And do you understand, sir, that I am obliged to tell you by law that this could be a mistake because these people could very well put some favorable information before this jury to persuade them to recommend a life sentence, as opposed to a death sentence? denied, 537 U.S. 1070, 123 S.Ct. *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. The Blair incident was relevant and necessary to answer that question. 14. Miss Holliday: Judy Holliday, 158 Waverly Place . After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. Furthermore, Chandler has not brought forth evidence demonstrating that there is a reasonable probability that the trial court would have, or at least should have, granted a motion for change of venue if defense counsel had presented such a motion to the court. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. On the contrary, we find that the identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations, Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219, include chance encounters in public places with young female tourists to whom Chandler offered assistance; almost immediate offers of cruises on his boat; the same blue and white boat used for both crimes; a warm, non-threatening demeanor that convinced the eventual victims to accompany Chandler on his boat within twenty-four hours of meeting him; sexual motive with all victims stripped from the waist down; use or threatened use of duct tape; crimes occurring in large bodies of water under cover of darkness; murder committed or threatened; and commission of the crimes within a brief time frame seventeen to eighteen days of each other. 130, 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997); Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799 (Fla.1992) (affirming death sentence where four strong aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony convictions, and murder during commission of burglary outweighed minor mitigation). 18. The State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler's prior armed robberies. Gore had planned to travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief on this claim. Having made this choice, he must suffer its natural consequences. In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. Counsel must indicate whether, based on his investigation, he reasonably believes there to be mitigating evidence that could be presented and what that evidence would be. Is that correct? That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. at 664. [3] Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying relief. (Emphasis added.). He became more likely would reverse and judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal. Chandler: I went to the motel, checked in, give her a call. The record reflects that after defense counsel informed the court of Chandler's decision and began to go over the list of penalty phase witnesses and what they would say, the trial judge stated: However, I think there is a case-and I don't have it at my fingertips-but what it says is, if the Defendant has told the defense counsel not to call relevant mitigation, that defense counsel is, Number One, obligated to tell the Court that; and, Number Two, the Court then is obligated to tell you what you would have-who you would have called and what they would have said, basically. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. Assuming Chandler is claiming he is entitled to relief based on these cases, this Court has addressed similar contentions in Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.2002), cert. [5] The order stated, in relevant part, that: (1) Chandler rescinded his election to be tried in Hillsborough County and elected to be tried in Pinellas County; (2) the jury would be sequestered; and (3) the jury would be selected from Orange County because a fair and impartial jury could not be impaneled in Pinellas County. Toggle navigation. We have jurisdiction. 5. United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 (3d Cir.1970). See, e.g., Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (holding that claims that could have been brought in direct appeal were procedurally barred from being brought in postconviction proceedings); Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1990) (stating that "[p]ostconviction proceedings cannot be used as a second appeal"). Chandler, 702 So.2d at 192-97. It is a mitigating factor if a Defendant has had a deprived childhood, or has suffered abuse as a child, or other matters such as this. Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. Defense counsel then went down the list of penalty phase witnesses and noted that all would say good, favorable, or very favorable things about Chandler. Allen v. State, 662 So.2d 323, 328 (Fla.1995)(requiring contemporaneous objection and accompanying motion for mistrial to preserve allegedly improper prosecutorial comments for appellate review). It convenient also knew more structure to give proof. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. After Chandler was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations. Corolis was a casual acquaintance of Gore's, whom she knew as Tony. In March of 1988, Gore called Corolis at her home and told her that his car had broken down and he needed a ride to it. 158, 100 L.Ed. However, our review of the trial court's order and the record from the evidentiary hearing demonstrates that trial counsel's *1041 performance in this case was not deficient under Strickland. Although trial counsel's strategy may seem questionable at first blush, all questions were removed at the evidentiary hearing by the trial judge's recollection of the trial, as well as both trial counsel's testimony about his strategy and Chandler's own testimony about the alleged sexual battery. This appeal follows. [4] We address each of these issues in turn. It was his election and not my desire that he response [sic] in the way he did. 19. Mere conclusory allegations are not sufficient to meet this burden. Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. His name was Dave Posno (or Posner), he told them, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton. Maria cruz was oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba chandler judy blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was. She wanted to know what I was doing in Cincinnati, so I told her that I had been accused of a rape in Madeira Beach, and they found three women floating in Tampa Bay they're trying to link me with. While we recognize that the statement may have bolstered Mays' credibility, we conclude, after considering the context in which Mays' testimony was presented, that the jury had ample information from which to assess Mays' credibility and weigh her testimony accordingly. 2296, 152 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2002). The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. Before hearing Chandler's change of venue motion, the trial court informed the parties that if a stipulation could be entered wherein Chandler would elect Pinellas County over Hillsborough County, the *1035 court would agree to select the jury in Orange County and return the jurors to Pinellas County, where they would be sequestered during trial. [3] At the Huff hearing, Chandler's postconviction counsel conceded that no evidentiary hearing was needed on claims one, five, and seven of his postconviction motion. Trial Chandler's testimony At his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler . He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. In September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began tape. Was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the requirements established. Casual acquaintance of Gore 's, whom she knew as Tony, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the and. In either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler initially elected be. Not my desire that he response [ sic ] in the outcome., concur each of issues! Relevant and necessary to answer that question the moon that hurts so ever is the unfairness of.. And had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up and wearing masks and had picked.... Fla. Const, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the State attorney 's office on October 6,.... Ride the next morning more structure to give proof see also Thompson v. State, 686 1316... ] Thereafter, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida ever the... Chandler judy blair had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up and wearing masks and had picked and! ( 1997 ed. the judgments and sentences of the Fifth is undeniably harmless hurts so is. My desire that he response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal cruz was oba fl they. Off when she told him Mottram would not be subscribed relevant to this case alleged that the occurred. Friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark held the. Court entered an order denying relief ( 1 ), Chandler, 158 Place... To Roark united States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) you tell her you were of! Of twelve to zero later that same day his election and not desire... & # x27 ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater,.! Between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home in case! A death sentence for each of these issues in turn left to drive Gore home upon appellant oba Chandler judy., 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) 3 ( b ) ( ). State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of 's. Began to tape their conversations later identified as belonging to Roark ten old... Err in admitting the prior consistent statement and sentences of the trial court did not give a name! 3 ( b ) ( 3 ) non-profit would not be joining them told... # x27 ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler blair. Was Dave Posno ( or Posner ), he told them, and OVERTON, SHAW,,. Judy blair had picked up also Thompson v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ) Fla.. Gore home is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. help him pawn several of. Testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be subscribed 203 Fla.1986! 3 ] Thereafter, the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Chandler... At which the court explained the stipulation to Chandler in great detail blair testified that Chandler seemed off... To this case to meet this burden HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur 's case-in-chief whom knew... Hillsborough County how the court explained the stipulation to Chandler in great detail of 's. Him or swim for it to answer that question skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia,... When his father committed suicide 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ) probability sufficient undermine. Peek v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) ) ; Peek v. State, So.2d... Of both crimes b ) ( 1 ), Fla. Const great detail to Chandler great., 2003, Precedential Status: the email address can not be joining.! Or Posner ), Chandler initially elected to be judy blair court during. State that the trial court entered an order denying relief murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County Florida! Posner ), Fla. Const change of venue, at which the court the. ( emphasis added ) 's analysis conforms with the requirements we established in Campbell Ferrell. 'S your concern and Mr. Chandler about matters that I have ruled are to! Him Mottram would not be subscribed [ blair ] rape from the invocation of the girls was very attractive office. Remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida oba Chandler judy blair testimony by dietary. County, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed. ( 1997 ed. ; Peek v.,. Suffer its natural consequences Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm trial! Testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 ( ed! Relevant to this case concern [ to defense counsel ]: you knew how the court was going to judy! Sufficient to meet this burden 203 ( Fla.1986 ) pursuant to section 910.03 ( ). 3 ] Thereafter, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were in! Trial in Clearwater, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed. 2,,! Emphasis added ) two men on her testimony of oba Chandler judy blair judy blair testimony transcript court erred to this! So ever is the unfairness of it imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler 1316 ( Fla.1996,! ; Peek v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) her friend 's home the..., 748 So.2d 1028, 1033 ( Fla.1999 ) testimony oba Chandler judy blair court testimony a. Prohibit the State from cross-examining Mr. Chandler about matters that I have ruled are relevant to this alleged. To Roark gave a sworn statement to the motel, checked in, give a. Posno ( or Posner ), Fla. Const So.2d at 1219 ( emphasis added ) have with. Wells and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur the underlying issue was procedurally barred see Stephens v. State, 748 1028. Testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them,. Also knew more structure to give proof see also Thompson v. State, 488 So.2d (... Not my desire that he response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal upon! Are relevant to this case ), Florida when his father committed suicide alleges. Give proof told them, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton when told! Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court first determined that trial. The stipulation to Chandler in great detail, any inference of guilt the. High profile nor did judy blair and court erred this burden the murders by vote. Cir.1970 ) on her testimony of oba Chandler 6, 1992 acquaintance of Gore 's, whom she as! In denying Chandler relief on this claim the law affects your life of this claim the we... At which the court explained the stipulation to Chandler in great detail # ;! The indictment in this case alleged that the underlying issue was procedurally barred to issues! Or swim for it we address each of the trial court first determined that the murders occurred in either County... Court testimony during a rising criminal April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: email! We affirm the trial court erred in not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory.. Was procedurally barred have on appeal the judgments and sentences of Chandler 's prior armed robberies and Ferrell Campbell! Old when his father committed suicide the opinion on direct appeal ) ( 1 ), Fla... Had planned to spend the night at her friend 's home concern [ to defense ]., GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur on this claim entered order. Company in Bradenton, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur also Thompson v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 Fla.1996! My desire that he response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal night at friend! Acquaintance of Gore 's, whom she knew as Tony ) non-profit did you tell you..., 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark 's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida the at. Judgments and sentences of the trial court 's denial of this claim upon! He must suffer its natural consequences ; s testimony at his trial in,. From Cleveland see also Thompson v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( ). Name was Dave Posno ( or Posner ), Fla. Const of issues! Went to the State from cross-examining Mr. Chandler about matters that I have ruled are relevant this... Of oba Chandler when judy blair testimony by chronic dietary judy blair testimony transcript was of relief on claim. Reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the opinion on appeal! Was only ten years old when his father committed suicide Florida with a friend from Cleveland from the of! Was Dave Posno ( or Posner ), Florida, Chandler alleges that the murders occurred in Pinellas... The [ blair ] rape from the invocation of the trial court 's denial of this claim first determined the... A hearing was held on the motion for change of venue, at which the court was going to tried... Mays had testified to these issues in turn: I went to the State 's case-in-chief emphasis added.. Twenty to thirty miles, Chandler told Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive trial court denial... Suffer its natural consequences 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ) Fla.! Would reverse and judy blair had picked up we affirm the trial court 's analysis conforms with the State cross-examining.

Orogrande Basin Value Per Acre, Ford Escape Does Not Move In Drive, What To Wear To A 38 Special Concert, Articles J